7 ACTIVE USERS    
412 VISITORS TODAY    
894 PAGES TODAY    
 
LAST MODIFIED: JANUARY-01-0001    

TOD PAPAGEORGE
I have no real argument against so-called set-up photography, at least as a process. The fact that I’ve had many successful students doing it in different ways I think makes my case. I also think that the reason they’ve felt free enough to work in this way at Yale is because I profoundly believe in—and teach—the proposition that photography is inherently a fiction-making process. Don’t speak to me of the document; I don’t really believe in it, particularly now. A picture’s not the world, but a new thing.

That said—too briefly—my argument against the set-up picture is that it leaves the matter of content to the IMAGINATION of the photographer, a faculty that, in my experience, is generally deficient compared to the mad swirling possibilities that our dear common world kicks up at us on a regular basis. That’s all. Remember, T. S. Eliot made the clear, brutal distinction between the art that floods us with the “aura” of experience, and the art that ‘presents’ the experience itself. ANY artist, I feel, must contend seriously with the question of which side of that distinction he or she is going to bet on in their work. Obviously, I’m with Eliot—and Homer—in this, believing that the mind-constructed photograph almost necessarily leads to a form of illustration, the very epitome of aura-art.
- Tod Papageorge - Alec Soth Interviews Tod Papageorge - http://alecsothblog.wordpress.com/2007/07/12/papageorge-interview/

<< PREVIOUS  .  HOME  .  NEXT >>

Leave Comments

 
SEARCH PHOTOQUOTES
 
FREE NEWSLETTER!
 
 
TELL A FRIEND!
Recommend this site
to your friend